> No, this isn't right. You'd need to use a mix of dev_dbg() and pr_cont(). > Basically in drivers it should always be dev_ printks except for pr_cont(). Tks, Dan, for the answer and suggestion. In this case, rather the dev_xxx(), do you think we can go with netdev_dbg() since this is a network driver and around the rtw_mlme_ext.c is already being used? (actually, I don't see a direct reference for struct device). If yes, I would mix the netdev_dbg() and pr_cont(). About [2], it is acceptable to remove the statements like I'm proposing? Tks and regards. [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20241015014738.41685-1-rodrigo.gobbi.7@xxxxxxxxx/T/#m85d88af4dd8158a8e62ccb6c7257478b7de46d95
