On 14/10/2024 10:12, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 09:59:49AM +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote: >> This approach is great as long as the maintainer accepts mid-scope >> variable declaration and the goto instructions get refactored, as stated >> in cleanup.h. >> >> The first point is not being that problematic so far, but the second one >> is trickier, and we all have to take special care to avoid such issues, >> even if they don't look dangerous in the current code, because adding a >> goto where there cleanup attribute is already used can be overlooked as >> well. >> > > To be honest, I don't really understand this paragraph. I think maybe you're > talking about if we declare the variable at the top and forget to initialize it > to NULL? It leads to an uninitialized variable if we exit the function before > it is initialized. > No, I am talking about declaring the variable mid-scope, and later on adding a goto before that declaration in a different patch, let's say far above the variable declaration. As soon as a goto is added, care must be taken to make sure that we don't have variables with the cleanup attribute in the scope. Just something to take into account. >> Actually there are goto instructions in the function, but at least in >> their current form they are as harmless as useless. > > Yep. Feel free to delete them. > > regards, > dan carpenter >