On 8/26/24 21:58, Gabriel Tassinari wrote:
fix parenthesis alignment in _rtl92e_qos_handle_probe_response to
silence checkpatch warning:
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Tassinari <gabrieldtassinari@xxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: Include the modified file in commit message
---
drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c
index ad21263e725f..18739583f579 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static int _rtl92e_qos_handle_probe_response(struct r8192_priv *priv,
if (network->flags & NETWORK_HAS_QOS_MASK) {
if (active_network &&
- (network->flags & NETWORK_HAS_QOS_PARAMETERS))
+ (network->flags & NETWORK_HAS_QOS_PARAMETERS))
network->qos_data.active = network->qos_data.supported;
if ((network->qos_data.active == 1) && (active_network == 1) &&
Hi Gabriel,
I would do the indentation one space deeper to show that it is included
in the if (
- (network->flags & NETWORK_HAS_QOS_PARAMETERS))
+ (network->flags & NETWORK_HAS_QOS_PARAMETERS))
You can ask the question why I did not tell you earlier... sorry I
missed that and I wonder why checkpatch did not catch that.
Thanks for your support.
Bye Philipp
