On 8/24/24 16:43, Gabriel Tassinari wrote:
fix parenthesis alignment in _rtl92e_qos_handle_probe_response to
silence checkpatch warning:
CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Tassinari <gabrieldtassinari@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c
index ad21263e725f..18739583f579 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_core.c
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static int _rtl92e_qos_handle_probe_response(struct r8192_priv *priv,
if (network->flags & NETWORK_HAS_QOS_MASK) {
if (active_network &&
- (network->flags & NETWORK_HAS_QOS_PARAMETERS))
+ (network->flags & NETWORK_HAS_QOS_PARAMETERS))
network->qos_data.active = network->qos_data.supported;
if ((network->qos_data.active == 1) && (active_network == 1) &&
Hi Gabriel,
Please make your "Subject" line more unique. Consider that we may end up
with having dozen of commits like yours, all of them referring to
different removals and all without the necessary information to tell
what they differ in (except the driver/subsystem). So it would help if
you add the changed file or function to make it more unique.
If you send in a second version of this patch please use a change
history. Description from Dan under:
https://staticthinking.wordpress.com/2022/07/27/how-to-send-a-v2-patch/
Thanks for your support.
Bye Philipp
