On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 09:04:11PM +0530, Abhishek Tamboli wrote:
> Replace strcpy() with strcat() in rtl819x_translate_scan()
> Also Fix proto_name[] buffer size issue to accommodate all
> network modes.
When you say "also" in a changelog text, that's a huge hint that this
should probably be split up into multiple changes. Please do that here.
More comments below.
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Tamboli <abhishektamboli9@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Revert the use of strscpy and replaced it with strcat.
> - Remove the 'pname' and replace it's usage with direct
> operations on 'proto_name' buffer.
>
> drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_wx.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_wx.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_wx.c
> index fbd4ec824084..ec0c4c5bade7 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_wx.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib_wx.c
> @@ -23,14 +23,14 @@ static const char * const rtllib_modes[] = {
> };
>
> #define MAX_CUSTOM_LEN 64
> +#define MAX_PROTO_NAME_LEN 10
Where did this "10" come from? What sets this limit? Why not 100?
1000? 2? You get the idea :)
> static inline char *rtl819x_translate_scan(struct rtllib_device *ieee,
> char *start, char *stop,
> struct rtllib_network *network,
> struct iw_request_info *info)
> {
> char custom[MAX_CUSTOM_LEN];
> - char proto_name[6];
> - char *pname = proto_name;
> + char proto_name[MAX_PROTO_NAME_LEN];
> char *p;
> struct iw_event iwe;
> int i, j;
> @@ -59,13 +59,12 @@ static inline char *rtl819x_translate_scan(struct rtllib_device *ieee,
> }
> /* Add the protocol name */
> iwe.cmd = SIOCGIWNAME;
> + /* Initialise proto_name as an empty string*/
> + memset(proto_name, '\0', sizeof(proto_name));
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rtllib_modes); i++) {
> - if (network->mode & BIT(i)) {
> - strcpy(pname, rtllib_modes[i]);
> - pname += strlen(rtllib_modes[i]);
> + if (network->mode & BIT(i))
> + strcat(proto_name, rtllib_modes[i]);
> }
> - }
I think the } placement is now incorrect, right? Did you run checkpatch
on this change?
thanks,
greg k-h
