On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 02:36:21PM +0900, Manjae Cho wrote: > This patch improves the usage of the MAR register by updating the > relevant > macro definitions and ensuring consistent usage across the codebase. > > Signed-off-by: Manjae Cho <manjae.cho@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/sdio_halinit.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/hal_com_reg.h | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/sdio_halinit.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/sdio_halinit.c > index c9cd6578f7f8..9493562c1619 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/sdio_halinit.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/sdio_halinit.c > @@ -380,8 +380,8 @@ static void _InitWMACSetting(struct adapter *padapter) > rtw_write32(padapter, REG_RCR, pHalData->ReceiveConfig); > > /* Accept all multicast address */ > - rtw_write32(padapter, REG_MAR, 0xFFFFFFFF); > - rtw_write32(padapter, REG_MAR + 4, 0xFFFFFFFF); > + rtw_write32(padapter, MAR0, 0xFFFFFFFF); > + rtw_write32(padapter, MAR4, 0xFFFFFFFF); > > /* Accept all data frames */ > value16 = 0xFFFF; > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/hal_com_reg.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/hal_com_reg.h > index 9a02ae69d7a4..baf326d53a46 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/hal_com_reg.h > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/include/hal_com_reg.h > @@ -151,6 +151,9 @@ > #define REG_BSSID 0x0618 > #define REG_MAR 0x0620 > > +#define MAR0 REG_MAR /* Multicast Address Register, Offset 0x0620-0x0623 */ > +#define MAR4 (REG_MAR + 4) /* Multicast Address Register, Offset 0x0624-0x0627 */ > + > #define REG_MAC_SPEC_SIFS 0x063A > /* 20100719 Joseph: Hardware register definition change. (HW datasheet v54) */ > #define REG_RESP_SIFS_CCK 0x063C /* [15:8]SIFS_R2T_OFDM, [7:0]SIFS_R2T_CCK */ > -- > 2.25.1 > > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what needs to be done here to properly describe this. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot
