Re: [PATCH] staging: vc04_services: vchiq_arm: Fix initialisation check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Greg Kroah-Hartman (2024-06-14 07:50:08)
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 08:41:46PM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> > The vchiq_state used to be obtained through an accessor
> > which would validate that the VCHIQ had been initialised
> > correctly with the remote.
> > 
> > In commit 42a2f6664e18 ("staging: vc04_services: Move global g_state to
> > vchiq_state") the global state was moved to the vchiq_mgnt structures
> > stored as a vchiq instance specific context. This conversion removed the
> > helpers and instead replaced users of this helper with the assumption
> > that the state is always available and the remote connected.
> > 
> > Fix this broken assumption by re-introducing the logic that was lost
> > during the conversion.
> > 
> > Fixes: 42a2f6664e18 ("staging: vc04_services: Move global g_state to vchiq_state")
> > Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c  | 4 ++--
> >  .../staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.h | 5 +++++
> >  .../staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c  | 7 ++++++-
> >  3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> You sent 2 different patches here, both with the same subject, which one
> is correct?

What in the git ... ? (history formatted to new lines..)

kbingham@Monstersaurus:~/iob/libcamera/raspberrypi/sources/linux$ history | grep send-email
 2427  git send-email \
 	./0001-staging-vc04_services-vchiq_arm-Fix-initialisation-c.patch \
 	--cc-cmd ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl \
	./0001-staging-vc04_services-vchiq_arm-Fix-initialisation-c.patch \
	--to "Umang Jain <umang.jain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" \
	--to "Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>" \
	--to "linux-rpi-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"

I .... uh ... somehow specified the patch twice...

So both mails are the identical patch. Would you like me to send a third
identical one as a v2? or pick either of these?

in fact - never mind - v2 coming.

--
Kieran


> 
> Please send a v2 so that I know what to apply, I've dropped this one
> from my queue now, thanks.
> 
> greg k-h





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Development]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux