On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 07:34:24PM +0000, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> platform_get_irq() already prints an error for us.
>
> Found by cocci:
> drivers/staging/media/sunxi/sun6i-isp/sun6i_isp.c:389:2-9: line 389 is redundant because platform_get_irq() already prints an error
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/media/sunxi/sun6i-isp/sun6i_isp.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/sunxi/sun6i-isp/sun6i_isp.c b/drivers/staging/media/sunxi/sun6i-isp/sun6i_isp.c
> index 5c0a45394cba..a6424fe7023b 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/sunxi/sun6i-isp/sun6i_isp.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/sunxi/sun6i-isp/sun6i_isp.c
> @@ -386,7 +386,6 @@ static int sun6i_isp_resources_setup(struct sun6i_isp_device *isp_dev,
>
> irq = platform_get_irq(platform_dev, 0);
> if (irq < 0) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to get interrupt\n");
> ret = -ENXIO;
This is more fall out from when irq functions used to return zero (16
years ago). Instead of ret = -ENXIO, set ret = irq.
regards,
dan carpenter
