On 3/16/24 21:42, Dorine Tipo wrote:
Remove unused function RFbAL7230SelectChannelPostProcess declared in
rf.h but has no associated implementation.
Commit dd2837bdea0e removed the RFbAL7230SelectChannelPostProcess() but
accidentally forgot to delete the declaration in the header file.
Fixes: dd2837bdea0e ("staging: vt6655: Remove unused byRFType in rf.c")
Signed-off-by: Dorine Tipo <dorine.a.tipo@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since V1:
V2: - Removed the unintended blank line after removing the dead code
- Removed "in rf.h" from the subject
V3: - Added in the Description Comment about unintended blank line
V4: - Adjusted complete description according to hint from feedback
- Rebased patch
V5: - Added a missing closing parenthesis in the fixes tag
V6: - Sent the wrong patch for v5. This version includes the fix in v5
V7: - Made the subjectline more uniques as suggested by
fabio.maria.de.francesco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
V8: - Put the entire subject on one line to ensure the function name
appears on the subject
drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.h | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.h b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.h
index 6f842ac00526..8eef100c7ef2 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.h
@@ -68,8 +68,4 @@ bool RFbRawSetPower(struct vnt_private *priv, unsigned char byPwr,
void RFvRSSITodBm(struct vnt_private *priv, unsigned char byCurrRSSI,
long *pldBm);
-/* {{ RobertYu: 20050104 */
-bool RFbAL7230SelectChannelPostProcess(struct vnt_private *priv, u16 byOldChannel, u16 byNewChannel);
-/* }} RobertYu */
-
#endif /* __RF_H__ */
--
2.25.1
Tested-by: Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@xxxxxxxxx>
