On Sat, 16 Mar 2024, Dorine Tipo wrote:
> Remove unused function RFbAL7230SelectChannelPostProcess declared in
> rf.h but has no associated implementation.
>
> Commit dd2837bdea0e removed the RFbAL7230SelectChannelPostProcess() but
> accidentally forgot to delete the declaration in the header file.
>
> Fixes: dd2837bdea0e ("staging: vt6655: Remove unused byRFType in rf.c")
> Signed-off-by: Dorine Tipo <dorine.a.tipo@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since V1:
>
> V2: - Removed the unintended blank line after removing the dead code
> - Removed "in rf.h" from the subject
>
> V3: - Added in the Description Comment about unintended blank line
>
> V4: - Adjusted complete description according to hint from feedback
> - Rebased patch
> V5: - Added a missing closing parenthesis in the fixes tag
>
> V6: - Sent the wrong patch for v5. This version includes the fix in v5
>
> V7: - Made the subjectline more uniques as suggested by
> fabio.maria.de.francesco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Actually, this doesn't seem to have worked. The name of the function is
not included.
julia
>
> drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.h | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.h b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.h
> index 6f842ac00526..8eef100c7ef2 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.h
> @@ -68,8 +68,4 @@ bool RFbRawSetPower(struct vnt_private *priv, unsigned char byPwr,
> void RFvRSSITodBm(struct vnt_private *priv, unsigned char byCurrRSSI,
> long *pldBm);
>
> -/* {{ RobertYu: 20050104 */
> -bool RFbAL7230SelectChannelPostProcess(struct vnt_private *priv, u16 byOldChannel, u16 byNewChannel);
> -/* }} RobertYu */
> -
> #endif /* __RF_H__ */
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
