Quoting Umang Jain (2024-03-15 10:56:56) > Re-evaluate logs on error code paths and fix a few error logs > with appropriate dev_* logging helpers. > > For a case where a null ptr check is performed, use a WARN_ON() > instead of logging to dev_err(). > > No functional changes intended in this patch. > > Signed-off-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c > index 1579bd4e5263..3c3e6f3e48ce 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c > @@ -1317,7 +1317,7 @@ vchiq_keepalive_thread_func(void *v) > long rc = 0, uc = 0; > > if (wait_for_completion_interruptible(&arm_state->ka_evt)) { > - dev_err(state->dev, "suspend: %s: interrupted\n", __func__); > + dev_dbg(state->dev, "suspend: %s: interrupted\n", __func__); This looks good. > flush_signals(current); > continue; > } > @@ -1380,7 +1380,7 @@ vchiq_use_internal(struct vchiq_state *state, struct vchiq_service *service, > service->client_id); > entity_uc = &service->service_use_count; > } else { > - dev_err(state->dev, "suspend: %s: null service ptr\n", __func__); > + WARN_ON(!service); This sounds like something that shouldn't happen. Can it actually happen? If it can happen - can it be caused by userspace through the VCHIQ interfaces or is this just an internal code path? Bumping up to a WARN_ON could probably need justification that deserves it's own patch, but for the rest of the lines: Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > ret = -EINVAL; > goto out; > } > @@ -1753,7 +1753,7 @@ static int vchiq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > */ > err = vchiq_register_chrdev(&pdev->dev); > if (err) { > - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "arm: Failed to initialize vchiq cdev\n"); > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "arm: Failed to initialize vchiq cdev\n"); > goto error_exit; > } > > @@ -1763,7 +1763,7 @@ static int vchiq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return 0; > > failed_platform_init: > - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "arm: Could not initialize vchiq platform\n"); > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "arm: Could not initialize vchiq platform\n"); > error_exit: > return err; > } > -- > 2.43.0 >