Re: [PATCH v2] Staging: pi433: Updated bitrate range from datasheet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 02:04:08PM +0530, Aman Sharma wrote:
> Tbh this is my first patch and I don't have the hardware to test this. I
> thought updating the values from the datasheet directly might be a good idea
> as it would be the correct range. Please correct me if there is something
> that I missed / need to know.
> 

No, patch is fine.  There is no downside to updating the .txt
documentation in this way.  I was just wondering.

> On 2024-03-04 13:55, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 11:23:40AM +0530, Aman Sharma wrote:
> > > Updated bitrate range for FSK and OOK modulation from the RFM69
> > > Datasheet.
> > > The values are mentioned in Section 2.3.2 of the datasheet.
> > 
> > Have you tested these as well?  Sending untested patches is not
> > necessarily against the rules, but it seems like maybe you have this
> > hardware and can test it.  Could you please talk about what testing you
> > did?
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Aman Sharma<amansharma6122002@xxxxxxxxx>
> >                             ^
> > Missing space.
> > 
> 
> I'll fix this if I am allowed to submit a new patch.

regards,
dan carpenter




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Development]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux