On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 11:23:40AM +0530, Aman Sharma wrote: > Updated bitrate range for FSK and OOK modulation from the RFM69 Datasheet. > The values are mentioned in Section 2.3.2 of the datasheet. > > Signed-off-by: Aman Sharma<amansharma6122002@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/pi433/Documentation/pi433.txt | 6 ++++-- > drivers/staging/pi433/TODO | 1 - > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/Documentation/pi433.txt > b/drivers/staging/pi433/Documentation/pi433.txt > index 4a0d34b4ad37..9ce7282ef6f8 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/pi433/Documentation/pi433.txt > +++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/Documentation/pi433.txt > @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ rf params: > Allowed values: 433050000...434790000 > bit_rate > bit rate used for transmission. > - Allowed values: ##### > + Allowed values (For FSK): 1200...320000 > + Allowed values (For OOK): 1200...32768 > dev_frequency > frequency deviation in case of FSK. > Allowed values: 600...500000 > @@ -169,7 +170,8 @@ rf params: > Allowed values: 433050000...434790000 > bit_rate > bit rate used for transmission. > - Allowed values: ##### > + Allowed values (For FSK): 1200...320000 > + Allowed values (For OOK): 1200...32768 > dev_frequency > frequency deviation in case of FSK. > Allowed values: 600...500000 > diff --git a/drivers/staging/pi433/TODO b/drivers/staging/pi433/TODO > index 63a40bfcc67e..61ed3a1578bc 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/pi433/TODO > +++ b/drivers/staging/pi433/TODO > @@ -2,4 +2,3 @@ > * still TODOs, annotated in the code > * currently the code introduces new IOCTLs. I'm afraid this is a bad idea. > -> Replace this with another interface, hints are welcome! > -* Some missing data (marked with ###) needs to be added in the > documentation > -- > 2.34.1 > Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what needs to be done here to properly describe this. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot
