On 05/02/2024 11:39, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On 2/5/24 02:29, Hans Verkuil wrote: >> On 27/01/2024 10:57, Sakari Ailus wrote: >>> Hi Ricardo, >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 11:16:16PM +0000, Ricardo Ribalda wrote: >>>> Kerneldoc cannot understand arrays defined like >>>> v4l2_frame_symbol_counts. >>>> >>>> Adding an asterisk to the name does do the trick. >>>> >>>> Disable the kerneldoc notation for now, it is already ignored: >>>> https://docs.kernel.org/search.html?q=v4l2_vp9_frame_symbol_counts >>> >>> Wouldn't it be nicer to fix kerneldoc instead? It might not be difficult at >>> all. >>> >>> Feel free to, but I can also give it a try. >>> >> >> It would be nice to have this fixed in kerneldoc itself. I'm holding this >> patch back for two weeks to see if someone wants to work on kerneldoc. >> >> If not, then I'll take this anyway to fix the noise in our build. >> >> Note that while this header is indeed ignored in the documentation, that >> is really more a bug and it would be nice to actually include this header >> somewhere in our documentation. So fixing these kerneldoc warnings one way >> or another is something that we should do. >> > > It's just waiting for Jon to apply it: (from Sakari) > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240131084934.191226-1-sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Ah, that patch was CCed to me but not to linux-media, and I only searched linux-media for it so I missed it. Good news that this is fixed in the right place. I marked this 17/17 patch as Obsoleted in patchwork. Regards, Hans
