Em Thu, 1 Feb 2024 13:33:08 +0100 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > Hi, > > On 2/1/24 13:18, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Em Thu, 1 Feb 2024 12:46:19 +0100 > > Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 2/1/24 07:10, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >>> Em Sun, 31 Dec 2023 11:39:18 +0100 > >>> Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > >>> > >>>> Hi Mauro, > >>>> > >>>> Here are the atomisp changes for 6.8. > >>>> > >>>> My patches in this set been posted on the list, but only a couple of > >>>> minutes ago, leaving pretty much zero time for review. Sorry about that, > >>>> with the holidays the timing did not work out very well. > >>>> > >>>> If you don't want to take this pull-request because of this it > >>>> would be good if you can at least take the patches up to > >>>> the "media: atomisp: Fix spelling mistake in ia_css_acc_types.h" > >>>> change. There are only 2 unreviewed patches from me in that > >>>> set, which fix the atomisp driver not working at all with > >>>> the latest media_stage/master code. And the rest of the patches > >>>> in that set are from others and have been reviewed by me. > >>> > >>> We typically close the media merge window at -rc6. As I was also > >>> in vacations during those weeks, this PR was merged today for 6.9. > >> > >> No problem, I know I was late with submitting this PR. > >> > >>> Indeed the first two patches seem to be needed to fix an issue on 6.8. > >>> Could you please send them to stable after their arrival at linux-next? > >> > >> I'm not sure what you mean with send them to stable ? > >> > >> 6.8 is not released yet, so these need to be send to Linus this > >> cycle. What is the process for media bugfixes for the current > >> kernel cycle ? > > > > Heh, sorry, somehow I was thinking on 6.7 :-) > > > > If the bug only happens on 6.8, I can just cherry-pick the two patches > > on my fixes branch. > > I believe you only need: > > "media: atomisp: Adjust for v4l2_subdev_state handling changes in 6.8" > > And as the subject says, that is a fix for 6.8, 6.7 is fine AFAIK. Ok, patch cherry-picked to the fixes branch. I'll send it together with the other pending patches after they arrive to linux-next (so likely next week). Thanks, Mauro
