On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 11:30:17PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/card.c b/drivers/staging/vt6655/card.c
> > index 36183f2a64c1..688c870d89bc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/card.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/card.c
> > @@ -81,9 +81,9 @@ static void vt6655_mac_set_bb_type(void __iomem *iobase, u32 mask)
> > * Return Value: none
> > */
> > static void calculate_ofdmr_parameter(unsigned char rate,
> > - u8 bb_type,
> > - unsigned char *tx_rate,
> > - unsigned char *rsv_time)
> > + u8 bb_type,
> > + unsigned char *tx_rate,
> > + unsigned char *rsv_time)
> > {
> > switch (rate) {
> > case RATE_6M:
>
> Is there any chance that checkpatch is wrong about this warning?
>
> I much prefer the alignment as it was before this patch: following lines
> are aligned with the first parameter after the '('.
>
It just looks weird in the diff because of the + character at the front
and how the tabs work out. It looks ok in the code.
regards,
dan carpenter
