Re: [PATCH v2] staging: media: atomisp: pci: Fix spelling mistake in ia_css_acc_types.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Randy,

On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 at 11:03, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Dipendra,
>
> On 12/22/23 21:11, Dipendra Khadka wrote:
> > codespell reported spelling mistakes in
> > ia_css_acc_types.h as below:
> >
> > '''
> > ia_css_acc_types.h:87: cummulative ==> cumulative
> > ia_css_acc_types.h:411: descibes ==> describes
> > '''
> >
> > This patch fixes these spelling mistakes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dipendra Khadka <kdipendra88@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch is an improvement so it could be merged as is IMO.
> But...
>
> > ---
> > v2:
> >  - Previously only corrected spelling  mistake reported by checkpatch.pl.
> >  - All spelling mistakes reported by codespell are fixed.
> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231222200350.2024-1-kdipendra88@xxxxxxxxx/
> >
> >  drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/ia_css_acc_types.h | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/ia_css_acc_types.h b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/ia_css_acc_types.h
> > index d6e52b4971d6..1dc2085ecd61 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/ia_css_acc_types.h
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/ia_css_acc_types.h
> > @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ struct ia_css_blob_info {
> >               memory_offsets;  /** offset wrt hdr in bytes */
> >       u32 prog_name_offset;  /** offset wrt hdr in bytes */
> >       u32 size;                       /** Size of blob */
> > -     u32 padding_size;       /** total cummulative of bytes added due to section alignment */
> > +     u32 padding_size;       /** total cumulative of bytes added due to section alignment */
>
> I apologize for not looking at your v1 patch carefully.
> The comment above would be much better as
>
>                                 /** total accumulation of bytes added due to section alignment */
>

So, would you like me to change "cummulative" to accumulation or
should I wait what other maintainer(s) would say?

Thanks.

> And if the maintainer(s) want to take it as is:
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> >       u32 icache_source;      /** Position of icache in blob */
> >       u32 icache_size;        /** Size of icache section */
> >       u32 icache_padding;/** bytes added due to icache section alignment */
> > @@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ struct ia_css_acc_sp {
> >  };
> >
> >  /* Acceleration firmware descriptor.
> > -  * This descriptor descibes either SP code (stand-alone), or
> > +  * This descriptor describes either SP code (stand-alone), or
> >    * ISP code (a separate pipeline stage).
> >    */
> >  struct ia_css_acc_fw_hdr {
>
> --
> #Randy
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
> https://subspace.kernel.org/etiquette.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Development]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux