On 24.11.2023 11:16, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > After removal of the legacy eeprom driver the only remaining I2C > client device driver supporting I2C_CLASS_SPD is jc42. Because this > driver also supports I2C_CLASS_HWMON, adapters don't have to > declare support for I2C_CLASS_SPD if they support I2C_CLASS_HWMON. > It's one step towards getting rid of I2C_CLASS_SPD mid-term. > > Series was created supported by Coccinelle and its splitpatch. > > v2: > - fix style issue in patch 4 > - add ack in patch 2 > - set proper subject prefix for all patches > > Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ali1535.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ali1563.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ali15x3.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amd756.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-amd8111.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-elektor.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-gpio.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ibm_iic.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-iop3xx.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-isch.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-kempld.c | 3 +-- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mlxcpld.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nforce2.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pasemi-pci.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-scmi.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh7760.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sibyte.c | 4 ++-- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sis5595.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sis630.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sis96x.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-via.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-viapro.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/scx200_acb.c | 2 +- > drivers/i2c/i2c-stub.c | 2 +- > drivers/media/pci/netup_unidvb/netup_unidvb_i2c.c | 2 +- > drivers/staging/greybus/i2c.c | 2 +- > 27 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) This series and my other series are sitting idle in patchwork for 3 weeks now. AFAICS they have the needed ack's. Anything missing before they can be applied?
