Philipp Hortmann <philipp.g.hortmann@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 12/12/23 17:56, Gary Rookard wrote:
>> oding style issue, Avoid CamelCase
>> rename it. pHT -> ht
>> Signed-off-by: Gary Rookard<garyrookard@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HTProc.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HTProc.c
>> b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HTProc.c
>> index ac85151a6069..add8f58b5b1e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HTProc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HTProc.c
>> @@ -250,17 +250,17 @@ void ht_reset_iot_setting(struct rt_hi_throughput *ht_info)
>> void ht_construct_capability_element(struct rtllib_device *ieee, u8 *pos_ht_cap,
>> u8 *len, u8 is_encrypt, bool assoc)
>> {
>> - struct rt_hi_throughput *pHT = ieee->ht_info;
>> + struct rt_hi_throughput *ht = ieee->ht_info;
>> struct ht_capab_ele *pCapELE = NULL;
>> - if (!pos_ht_cap || !pHT) {
>> + if (!pos_ht_cap || !ht) {
>> netdev_warn(ieee->dev,
>> "%s(): posHTCap and ht_info are null\n", __func__);
>> return;
>> }
>> memset(pos_ht_cap, 0, *len);
>> - if ((assoc) && (pHT->ePeerHTSpecVer == HT_SPEC_VER_EWC)) {
>> + if ((assoc) && (ht->ePeerHTSpecVer == HT_SPEC_VER_EWC)) {
>> static const u8 EWC11NHTCap[] = { 0x00, 0x90, 0x4c, 0x33 };
>> memcpy(pos_ht_cap, EWC11NHTCap, sizeof(EWC11NHTCap));
>> @@ -275,9 +275,9 @@ void ht_construct_capability_element(struct rtllib_device *ieee, u8 *pos_ht_cap,
>> if (ieee->GetHalfNmodeSupportByAPsHandler(ieee->dev))
>> pCapELE->ChlWidth = 0;
>> else
>> - pCapELE->ChlWidth = (pHT->reg_bw_40mhz ? 1 : 0);
>> + pCapELE->ChlWidth = (ht->reg_bw_40mhz ? 1 : 0);
>
> The last line changed with my patch:
> [PATCH 02/10] staging: rtl8192e: Remove variable ht_info->reg_bw_40mhz
>
> It is always difficult to know which patches are accepted by the
> maintainer but you may want to look into the following mailing list to
> see if there have been any patches send in for this driver.
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/
>
> You could apply the send in patches and build your ones on top. Then
> you do not have this issue. But when the patches you are using are not
> accepted you will run into the same issues.
>
> Thanks for your support.
>
> Bye Philipp
Okay, no problem.
Regards,
Gary
--
Sent with my mu4e on Gentoo GNU/linux.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
