Hi Greg, Am 29.10.23 um 13:48 schrieb Stefan Wahren:
Hello, since recent discussion raised the question about the future of debugfs for vchiq [1], i want to submit this cleanup patch series as part of the discussion and a small Halloween present ;-) Best regards Changes in V2: - rebase on top of current staging-next - address suggestion from Laurent Pinchart in patch 1 - fix checkpatch issue (too long line) in patch 2 [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7ea529c2-3da6-47df-9b09-28d4ab36c4ef@kadam.mountain/T/ Stefan Wahren (3): staging: vchiq_core: Make vchiq_dump_service_state static staging: vchiq_core: Shorten bulk TX/RX pending dump staging: vchiq_arm: move state dump to debugfs
should i resend incl. the received Reviewed-by tags?
.../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 94 ++---- .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.h | 7 - .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c | 274 +++++++----------- .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.h | 16 +- .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_debugfs.c | 10 + .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_dev.c | 21 -- 6 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 285 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
