On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 05:30:13PM +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> This patch adds 2 helpers functions to add and remove vb2 buffers
> from a queue. With these 2 and vb2_get_buffer(), bufs field of
> struct vb2_queue becomes like a private member of the structure.
>
> After each call to vb2_get_buffer() we need to be sure that we get
> a valid pointer in preparation for when buffers can be deleted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c | 151 +++++++++++++-----
> .../media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c | 50 ++++--
> 2 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c
> index 968b7c0e7934..b406a30a9b35 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-core.c
> @@ -408,6 +408,31 @@ static void init_buffer_cache_hints(struct vb2_queue *q, struct vb2_buffer *vb)
> vb->skip_cache_sync_on_finish = 1;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * vb2_queue_add_buffer() - add a buffer to a queue
> + * @q: pointer to &struct vb2_queue with videobuf2 queue.
> + * @vb: pointer to &struct vb2_buffer to be added to the queue.
> + * @index: index where add vb2_buffer in the queue
> + */
> +static void vb2_queue_add_buffer(struct vb2_queue *q, struct vb2_buffer *vb, unsigned int index)
> +{
> + WARN_ON(index >= VB2_MAX_FRAME || q->bufs[index]);
nit: Would it make sense to also ensure that vb->vb2_queue is NULL?
> +
> + q->bufs[index] = vb;
> + vb->index = index;
> + vb->vb2_queue = q;
> +}
[snip]
> diff --git a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
> index d19d82a75ac6..2ffb097bf00a 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-v4l2.c
> @@ -377,6 +377,12 @@ static int vb2_queue_or_prepare_buf(struct vb2_queue *q, struct media_device *md
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> + vb = vb2_get_buffer(q, b->index);
> + if (!vb) {
> + dprintk(q, 1, "%s: buffer %u is NULL\n", opname, b->index);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
Is this a leftover from earlier revisions? I think it shouldn't be
needed anymore after the previous patch which changed the function to
get vb as an argument.
Best regards,
Tomasz
