Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: vc04_services: Drop completed TODO item

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Umang,

i hope it's okay to add the most of the recipients again.

Am 26.10.23 um 14:42 schrieb Umang Jain:
Hi Stefan

On 10/25/23 10:16 PM, Stefan Wahren wrote:
Hi Umang,

Am 25.10.23 um 12:32 schrieb Umang Jain:
Drop the TODO item which deals with non-essential global
structures and per-device structure. All this has been
handled now through vchiq-bus and struct vchiq_device.

Signed-off-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/TODO | 8 --------
  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/TODO
b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/TODO
index 6d9d4a800aa7..9c79ed549831 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/TODO
+++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/TODO
@@ -46,14 +46,6 @@ The code follows the 80 characters limitation yet
tends to go 3 or 4 levels of
  indentation deep making it very unpleasant to read. This is
specially relevant
  in the character driver ioctl code and in the core thread functions.

-* Get rid of all non essential global structures and create a
proper per
-device structure
at first thank for all the great work. Currently i don't have much time
to give a feedback for everything :-(

No worries. As long as things are progressing, I don't mind.

Tbh this TODO is not finished yet. There are still global structures.
Please look at variables starting with g_* in vchiq_arm.c and
vchiq_connected.c


Ah just saw them now. Oh god, these are a pain.
Unfortunately i cannot tell which of them are easy to move into the
device structure.

Indeed. I don't have much time left this week, so probably I'll start
developing something over next week. :-/

Also do you know where I can find some overview documentation of the
driver itself? I don't think I understand the details of "how this
driver is supposed to function" in the first place.
unfortunately this is the reason for point 4 in the TODO list.

In the past i started a request in the Raspberry Pi github [1], but i
didn't get a fully satisfying response. Maybe this kind of documentation
is under NDA.

I vaguely remember of a little bit documentation on Github, but it
wasn't specific to the Linux driver.

[1] - https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/2730






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Development]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux