On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 10:38:22AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 02:13:26PM -0700, Soumya Negi wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 11:57:40AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 01:26:34AM -0700, Soumya Negi wrote:
> > > > Fix CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
> > > > Issue found by checkpatch.pl
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Soumya Negi <soumya.negi97@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c | 4 ++--
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
> > > > index 32b2e817ff04..4e5cac76db58 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/gdm724x/gdm_tty.c
> > > > @@ -271,8 +271,8 @@ int register_lte_tty_driver(void)
> > > > int ret;
> > > >
> > > > for (i = 0; i < TTY_MAX_COUNT; i++) {
> > > > - tty_driver = tty_alloc_driver(GDM_TTY_MINOR,
> > > > - TTY_DRIVER_REAL_RAW | TTY_DRIVER_DYNAMIC_DEV);
> > > > + tty_driver = tty_alloc_driver(GDM_TTY_MINOR, TTY_DRIVER_REAL_RAW |
> > > > + TTY_DRIVER_DYNAMIC_DEV);
> > >
> > > I prefered the original code. It was more readable.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > dan carpenter
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > Noted. I'm curious what happens when some of the patches in a patchset
> > are acceptable and some are not. Is everything disregarded by
> > maintainers or are the good patches cherry-picked from the set?
>
> Most of the time, you should just resend the series. Sometimes a
> maintainer will take the first few patches and then when they hit one
> that can't be merged they'll stop. So you should try to organize your
> patchsets from fixes first, then cleanups and then least controversial
> to most controversial. Except people might be annoyed if it looks like
> you're hiding a really controversial one at the end of a long series.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
Thank you!
- Soumya
