On 17.10.2023 09:19, Gilbert Adikankwu wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 08:19:49AM +0200, Philipp Hortmann wrote:
On 10/17/23 00:58, Gilbert Adikankwu wrote:
Make the variable names adhere to Linux kernel coding style and mute
checkpatch.pl errors.
A small nit from my side -- "mute" suggests that you suppressed the
warning/error, but your changes fix them, so why now say "fix
checkpatch.pl errors"?
Gilbert Adikankwu (4):
staging: vt6655: Rename variable bUpdateBBVGA
staging: vt6655: Rename variable byCurrentCh
staging: vt6655: Rename variable byCurPwr
staging: vt6655: Rename variable byBBPreEDRSSI
drivers/staging/vt6655/baseband.c | 2 +-
drivers/staging/vt6655/channel.c | 18 +++++++++---------
drivers/staging/vt6655/device.h | 8 ++++----
drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c | 8 ++++----
drivers/staging/vt6655/dpc.c | 2 +-
drivers/staging/vt6655/rf.c | 4 ++--
6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
Hi,
- if (priv->byCurrentCh == ch->hw_value)
+ if (priv->current_ch == ch->hw_value)^M
return ret;
ERROR: DOS line endings
What does the "^M" at the end of the new line?
Did you run checkpatch on your patches?
Thanks
Bye
Philipp
Hello,
I do not know what this error means. If anything, I'm surprised there is
an error. checkpatch is hooked to my git commit and all the patches
built cleanly on my machine. I will resend now.
I'm not seeing that error when the patch is applied. You could
double-check the patch files before sending by calling checkpatch.pl on
them directly.
This could be also because of how some email clients change the endings
on download, like Thunderbird, and the patch itself might be fine.
All the best,
Karolina
Thanks
Gilbert