Hi Calvince,
...
> -/*
> - * prism2sta_inf_handover
> - *
> - * Handles the receipt of a Handover info frame. Should only be present
> - * in APs only.
> - *
> - * Arguments:
> - * wlandev wlan device structure
> - * inf ptr to info frame (contents in hfa384x order)
> - *
> - * Returns:
> - * nothing
> - *
> - * Side effects:
> - *
> - * Call context:
> - * interrupt
> - */
> -static void prism2sta_inf_handover(struct wlandevice *wlandev,
> - struct hfa384x_inf_frame *inf)
> -{
> - pr_debug("received infoframe:HANDOVER (unhandled)\n");
> -}
> -
> /*
> * prism2sta_inf_tallies
> *
> @@ -1724,7 +1697,7 @@ void prism2sta_ev_info(struct wlandevice *wlandev,
> /* Dispatch */
> switch (inf->infotype) {
> case HFA384x_IT_HANDOVERADDR:
> - prism2sta_inf_handover(wlandev, inf);
> + pr_debug("received infoframe:HANDOVER (unhandled)\n");
while I think the patch is correct, I believe you should take
this opportunity to use a better printing function. I am not a
network developer, but I believe network people would prefer
netdev_dbg() at this point.
The pr_*() family is one of the most generic printing method,
useful for debug and few other situations. Other printing
functions should be preferred because the provide more context.
Andi
