Re: [PATCH] staging: fbtft: Removed unnecessary parenthesis around conditions to comply with the checkpatch coding style.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 11:58:47AM +1000, angus gardner wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback Bagas,
> 
> "Then checkpatch is wrong, " lol
> 
> Ill double check my SoB.
> 

tl;dr:

> A: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_post
> Q: Were do I find info about this thing called top-posting?
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
> 
> A: No.
> Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
> 
> http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top

Also, don't send HTML emails as mailing lists reject them away.

Last but not least, this is the third time you do parentheses fixup, for
which Greg's bot said:

>   You sent a patch that has been sent multiple times in the past few
>   days, and is identical to ones that has been recently rejected.
>   Please always look at the mailing list traffic to determine if you are
>   duplicating other people's work.

Again, read all Documentation/process/*.rst docs so that you won't make
mistakes again as kernel developer.

Bye!

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Development]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux