On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 10:44:42AM -0400, ozlinux@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 04:17:16PM +0200, Nam Cao wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 09:39:13AM -0400, Oliver Crumrine wrote: > > > Make the octeon ethernet driver better conform to the linux kernel coding standards > > > > > > Oliver Crumrine (6): > > > staging: octeon: clean up the octeon ethernet driver > > > staging: octeon: clean up the octeon ethernet driver > > > staging: octeon: clean up the octeon ethernet driver > > > staging: octeon: clean up the octeon ethernet driver > > > staging: octeon: clean up the octeon ethernet driver > > > staging: octeon: clean up the octeon ethernet driver > > > > > > drivers/staging/octeon/ethernet.c | 6 ++-- > > > drivers/staging/octeon/octeon-stubs.h | 50 +++++++++++++-------------- > > > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > > > > > -- > > > 2.39.3 > > > > > > > The patches themselves should also be sent with this cover letter. Instead they > > are sent in a different thread :( > > > > Best regards, > > Nam > > Looking at the what I sent, all the patches should be in reply to > <cover.1693229582.git.ozlinux@xxxxxxxxxxx>, both according to the patch > that was created by git format-patch, and Outlook. If in-reply-to and > the thread are 2 different things, please let me know, and instruct me on > how I should put the patches in the same thread. You seem to do it correctly, so sorry but I also do not know what went wrong. Maybe someone who knows more about email can help here. Best regards, Nam
