On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 11:37:13PM -0700, Tree Davies wrote: > Rename functions to fix checkpatch warning: Avoid CamelCase > > Tree Davies (5): > Staging: rtl8192e: Rename function ActivateBAEntry > Staging: rtl8192e: Rename function DeActivateBAEntry > Staging: rtl8192e: Rename function TxTsDeleteBA > Staging: rtl8192e: Rename function RxTsDeleteBA > Staging: rtl8192e: Rename function ResetBaEntry > > drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_BAProc.c | 44 +++++++++++------------ > drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_TSProc.c | 6 ++-- > drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtllib.h | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) Odd, how did you send these patches? They are not properly "threaded" or "connected" such that if you look them up on lore.kernel.org, or in your email client, they show that they should be connected. Here's what they look like in my inbox right now: 1 T Jul 24 Tree Davies (0.6K) [PATCH 0/5] Staging: rtl8192e: Function name cleanup series 1 2 N T Jul 24 Tree Davies (1.9K) [PATCH 3/5] Staging: rtl8192e: Rename function TxTsDeleteBA 3 F Jul 25 To linux-kernel ( 29) [PATCH v2] Documentation: embargoed-hardware-issues.rst: add AMD to the list 4 N T Jul 24 Tree Davies (2.5K) [PATCH 5/5] Staging: rtl8192e: Rename function ResetBaEntry 5 N T Jul 24 Tree Davies (1.8K) [PATCH 4/5] Staging: rtl8192e: Rename function RxTsDeleteBA 6 N T Jul 24 Tree Davies (3.1K) [PATCH 2/5] Staging: rtl8192e: Rename function DeActivateBAEntry 7 N T Jul 24 Tree Davies (1.7K) [PATCH 1/5] Staging: rtl8192e: Rename function ActivateBAEntry While if I look at a different recent series sent for staging patches, send correctly, they look like: 372 T Jul 22 Franziska Naepe (0.9K) [PATCH 0/9] staging: rtl8723bs: ioctl_linux: Fix checkpatch issues 373 C Jul 22 Franziska Naepe (0.8K) ├─>[PATCH 9/9] staging: rtl8723bs: ioctl_linux: Fix comparison to false 374 C Jul 22 Franziska Naepe (7.2K) ├─>[PATCH 8/9] staging: rtl8723bs: ioctl_linux: Add preferred spaces 375 C Jul 22 Franziska Naepe (2.2K) ├─>[PATCH 7/9] staging: rtl8723bs: ioctl_linux: Fix alignment on open parenthesis 376 C Jul 22 Franziska Naepe ( 10K) ├─>[PATCH 6/9] staging: rtl8723bs: ioctl_linux: Remove unnecessary parentheses 377 C Jul 22 Franziska Naepe (5.9K) ├─>[PATCH 5/9] staging: rtl8723bs: ioctl_linux: Remove unnecessary blank lines 378 C Jul 22 Franziska Naepe (4.1K) ├─>[PATCH 4/9] staging: rtl8723bs: ioctl_linux: Remove multiple blank lines 379 C Jul 22 Franziska Naepe (1.0K) ├─>[PATCH 3/9] staging: rtl8723bs: ioctl_linux: Fix block comment alignment 380 C Jul 22 Franziska Naepe (0.9K) ├─>[PATCH 2/9] staging: rtl8723bs: ioctl_linux: Fix code indent 381 C Jul 22 Franziska Naepe (0.9K) └─>[PATCH 1/9] staging: rtl8723bs: ioctl_linux: Fix else on next line See the difference with the -> and such? No other messages in the middle of the thread, and they are all connected together so that our tools can handle them as a series, not as individual patches. If you use 'git send-email' to send the whole back of patches at once, they will be properly connected together, so I do recommend using that if you are starting out. Please fix up and try again, thanks. greg k-h
