Checkpatch.pl alerted that usleep_range is preferred to udelay. This change was made in nvec.c file. Signed-off-by: umilojkovic <uroshm@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c index 2823cacde130..8bb3b691d1f5 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c +++ b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c @@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev) break; case 2: /* first byte after command */ if (status == (I2C_SL_IRQ | RNW | RCVD)) { - udelay(33); + usleep_range(33, 200); if (nvec->rx->data[0] != 0x01) { dev_err(nvec->dev, "Read without prior read command\n"); @@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev) * We experience less incomplete messages with this delay than without * it, but we don't know why. Help is appreciated. */ - udelay(100); + usleep_range(100, 200); return IRQ_HANDLED; } -- 2.34.1