Hello Hans,
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 10:40:43PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 5/23/23 22:00, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > After commit b8a1a4cd5a98 ("i2c: Provide a temporary .probe_new()
> > call-back type"), all drivers being converted to .probe_new() and then
> > 03c835f498b5 ("i2c: Switch .probe() to not take an id parameter") convert
> > back to (the new) .probe() to be able to eventually drop .probe_new() from
> > struct i2c_driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Hello,
> >
> > this patch was generated using coccinelle.
> >
> > I chose to convert all drivers below drivers/staging in a single
> > patch, but if you prefer I can split by driver.
>
> I'm currently doing a lot of cleanup work on the atomisp code
> including the sensor drivers. Specifically I'm working on
> removing drivers which are duplicate with the standard v4l2
> sensor drivers under drivers/media/i2c . So this patch is
> likely to cause conflicts.
>
> I have my own branch for my atomisp work from which I send
> pull-reqs directly to Mauro Chehab:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hansg/linux.git/log/?h=media-atomisp
>
> As such I think for the atomisp drivers it would be best if I directly
> apply the atomisp bits of this patch (no need for a resend) to my
> media-atomisp branch, is that ok with you ?
For me that would be fine, it's mostly Greg who has to cope. As Jonathan
also suggested to split, I suggest I do this. Then everyone can pickup
the usual bits without too much conflicts.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
