On Thu, 11 May 2023 20:33:56 +0700 Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > I trigger this patch series because of Didi's GPL full name fixes > attempt [1], for which all of them had been NAKed. In many cases, the > appropriate correction is to use SPDX license identifier instead. > > Often, when replacing license notice boilerplates with their equivalent > SPDX identifier, the notice doesn't mention explicit GPL version. Greg > [2] replied this question by falling back to GPL 1.0 (more precisely > GPL 1.0+ in order to be compatible with GPL 2.0 used by Linux kernel), > although there are exceptions (mostly resolved by inferring from > older patches covering similar situation). Should you be CCing linux-spdx@ on this?
