On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 09:55:45AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 01:31:10AM -0700, Sumitra Sharma wrote:
> > Convert 'pwm_chip_to_gb_pwm_chip' from a macro to a static
> > inline function, to make the relevant types apparent in the
> > definition and to benefit from the type checking performed by
> > the compiler at call sites.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sumitra Sharma <sumitraartsy@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c | 6 ++++--
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c
> > index 3fda172239d2..88da1d796f13 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c
> > @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ struct gb_pwm_chip {
> > struct pwm_chip chip;
> > struct pwm_chip *pwm;
> > };
> > -#define pwm_chip_to_gb_pwm_chip(chip) \
> > - container_of(chip, struct gb_pwm_chip, chip)
> >
> > +static inline struct gb_pwm_chip *pwm_chip_to_gb_pwm_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> > +{
> > + return container_of(chip, struct gb_pwm_chip, chip);
> > +}
> >
> > static int gb_pwm_count_operation(struct gb_pwm_chip *pwmc)
> > {
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
> >
>
> This patch didn't apply due to changes made in my tree by a patch from
> someone else before yours. Can you rebase it and resend?
>
Hi greg,
I am confused, will that be a totally new patch or a new version(v4 in
this case)?
Regards,
Sumitra
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
