On ١٩/٣/٢٠٢٣ ٢٢:٢١, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Sun, 19 Mar 2023, Menna Mahmoud wrote:Convert `to_gbphy_dev` and `to_gbphy_driver` macros into a static inline functions. it is not great to have macro that use `container_of` macro, because from looking at the definition one cannot tell what type it applies to. One can get the same benefit from an efficiency point of view by making an inline function. Suggested-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Menna Mahmoud <eng.mennamahmoud.mm@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.h | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.h b/drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.h index 1de510499480..42c4e3fe307c 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.h +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.h @@ -16,7 +16,10 @@ struct gbphy_device { struct device dev; };You have made the patch against your previous patch that added a newline here. It should be against Greg's tree. julia
you mean I should remove this newline, right? Menna
-#define to_gbphy_dev(d) container_of(d, struct gbphy_device, dev) +static inline struct gbphy_device *to_gbphy_dev(const struct device *d) +{ + return container_of(d, struct gbphy_device, dev); +} static inline void *gb_gbphy_get_data(struct gbphy_device *gdev) { @@ -45,7 +48,10 @@ struct gbphy_driver { struct device_driver driver; }; -#define to_gbphy_driver(d) container_of(d, struct gbphy_driver, driver) +static inline struct gbphy_driver *to_gbphy_driver(struct device_driver *d) +{ + return container_of(d, struct gbphy_driver, driver); +} int gb_gbphy_register_driver(struct gbphy_driver *driver, struct module *owner, const char *mod_name); -- 2.34.1
