On ١٩/٣/٢٠٢٣ ١٨:٠٩, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
On domenica 19 marzo 2023 16:29:09 CET Menna Mahmoud wrote:
> Remove unnecessary blank line before struct as reported
> by checkpatch:
>
> " CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines "
>
> Signed-off-by: Menna Mahmoud <eng.mennamahmoud.mm@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c
b/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c
> index 3fda172239d2..26d39e08c3b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/pwm.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ struct gb_pwm_chip {
> #define pwm_chip_to_gb_pwm_chip(chip) \
> container_of(chip, struct gb_pwm_chip, chip)
>
> -
> static int gb_pwm_count_operation(struct gb_pwm_chip *pwmc)
> {
> struct gb_pwm_count_response response;
> --
> 2.34.1
Hi Menna,
Hi Fabio,
I just saw that today you sent this patch at least three times:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20230319114155.42148-2-eng.mennamahmoud.mm@xxxxxxxxx/
This for different file, and the below I sent it with other patch so I
resend it again.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20230319152909.163598-1-eng.mennamahmoud.mm@xxxxxxxxx/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-staging/20230319132452.151877-2-eng.mennamahmoud.mm@xxxxxxxxx/
Why are you doing so?
sorry for this.
Please send your patches only once and wait at least a week without
any replies before resending. Furthermore, when resending, please
explain under the three dashes ("---") why you are doing so. Patches
may get lost, but this is not your case for sending them again and
again in a single day.
got your point.
Is there anything I'm missing?
Thanks,
Fabio
Thanks,
Menna