On Thu, 16 Mar 2023, Sumitra Sharma wrote:
> Since the coding style limited the code to 80 columns per line which caused
> splitting the function header into two lines resulted in the first line
> ending with a '('. This caused the checkpatch error.
The first sentence is still not really grammatical. Something like:
The coding style used to limit lines to 80 characters, which led to
splitting this function header into multiple lines, and ending thie first
line with a (.
For checkpatch, is it an error or a warning?
julia
>
> Place the function parameters immediately after '(' in a single
> line to align the function header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumitra Sharma <sumitraartsy@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2: Change patch subject and description
>
> v3: Change patch description, noted by Deepak R Varma
> <drv@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> v4: Correct grammartical mistakes, noted by Julia Lawall
> <julia.lawall@xxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
> drivers/staging/octeon/octeon-stubs.h | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/octeon/octeon-stubs.h b/drivers/staging/octeon/octeon-stubs.h
> index 7a02e59e283f..3e7b92cd2e35 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/octeon/octeon-stubs.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/octeon/octeon-stubs.h
> @@ -1372,9 +1372,7 @@ static inline void cvmx_fau_async_fetch_and_add32(uint64_t scraddr,
> int32_t value)
> { }
>
> -static inline union cvmx_gmxx_rxx_rx_inbnd cvmx_spi4000_check_speed(
> - int interface,
> - int port)
> +static inline union cvmx_gmxx_rxx_rx_inbnd cvmx_spi4000_check_speed(int interface, int port)
> {
> union cvmx_gmxx_rxx_rx_inbnd r;
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
>
