On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 02:13:51PM +0100, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote: > On mercoledì 15 marzo 2023 13:32:55 CET Khadija Kamran wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 04:57:47PM -0700, Alison Schofield wrote: > > > My guess is that this patch gets ignored because it has a lower version > > > number than a previous patch. > > > > > > Take the feedback given here, and rev to > > > [PATCH v5] staging: axis-fifo: initialize timeouts in probe only > > > > > > Be sure the Changelog, below the --- explains the journey. > > > > > > Changes in v5: > > > > > > Changes in v4: > > > > > > Changes in v3: > > > > > Changes in v2: > > Hey Alison! > > Hi Khadija, > > Please put one or two blank lines between the last message you are replying > and the new you are writing (exactly as I'm doing here between "Hey Alison!" > and "Hi Khadija"). > Hey Fabio! Sorry about that. This was pointed by Alison before and I have been adding spaces since then. Hopefully I am doing it right this time. > > Based on Nathan's feedback I am trying to recompile and send a patch > > without any warnings. > > Great! > > > As suggested by Fabio, I am running "make w=1 -jX" command to see if I > > get any warnings. > > I suppose that "w=1" is a typo. The option is enabled with "W=1" (capital > case, Linux and all UNIX-like are case-sensitive). > Okay. I should re-run it with "W=1". > > But it is taking a lot of time, is there any way of > > speeding it up? > > What is you choice for 'X' in "-jX"? I used "-j4". > Did you try with the exact number of logical cores? > Are you building into a VM with enough logical cores? > If you are building into a VM, did you reserve enough RAM? I am using Ubuntu 22.04.01 with the help of VM on VMware. My machine has 13GB RAM and 2 processors(4 cores each). > Please read carefully my questions above and try to understand your > environment and reply, so that I can help you more effectively. > > > If this doesn't work then I have to follow the steps to reproduce in lkp > > mail as you said before. > > The steps to reproduce will take your precious time and use more resources. > Again, try to respond my questions. > > > After dealing with these warnings I will send a [PATCH v5], following > > your instructions above. > > Sorry for inadvertently overlooking to warn you about to send a message to > Greg and ask him to drop your first 3 + 1 patches. Now you are doing good by > following what Alison suggested: send v5 and write the log of revisions under > the three dashes (exactly how Alison explained). > > > Kindly, let me know if I am on the wrong track. > > Thank you! > > > > I think you are in the right track. > Let's try to speed up your builds because you'll need to build again your > kernel many, many times for future works. > Okay great! Thank you. Regards, Khadija > Thanks, > > Fabio > >
