On Sat, 11 Mar 2023, Khadija Kamran wrote:
> In file drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c, in line 386 and 529, the
> last argument is indented as if it were an argument of the second
> argument. Remove tabs to align the arguments.
You don't need the file name or the line numbers. That information is
sufficiently obvious in the patch itself. On the other hand, it could be
helpful rto point out that these are calls to
wait_event_interruptible_timeout and indeed that it is the timeout
argument that is misplaced. That would help the reader know what to look
for in reading the patch.
julia
>
> Signed-off-by: Khadija Kamran <kamrankhadijadj@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Do not align the line 530 since it is not part of the last argument.
You can keep the entire history here.
julia
> drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c b/drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c
> index dfd2b357f484..b119cec25a60 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/axis-fifo/axis-fifo.c
> @@ -384,9 +384,9 @@ static ssize_t axis_fifo_read(struct file *f, char __user *buf,
> mutex_lock(&fifo->read_lock);
> ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(fifo->read_queue,
> ioread32(fifo->base_addr + XLLF_RDFO_OFFSET),
> - (read_timeout >= 0) ?
> - msecs_to_jiffies(read_timeout) :
> - MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> + (read_timeout >= 0) ?
> + msecs_to_jiffies(read_timeout) :
> + MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
>
> if (ret <= 0) {
> if (ret == 0) {
> @@ -528,9 +528,9 @@ static ssize_t axis_fifo_write(struct file *f, const char __user *buf,
> ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(fifo->write_queue,
> ioread32(fifo->base_addr + XLLF_TDFV_OFFSET)
> >= words_to_write,
> - (write_timeout >= 0) ?
> - msecs_to_jiffies(write_timeout) :
> - MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> + (write_timeout >= 0) ?
> + msecs_to_jiffies(write_timeout) :
> + MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
>
> if (ret <= 0) {
> if (ret == 0) {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
>
