On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 01:20:46AM +0100, Guru Mehar Rachaputi wrote: > This patch is to fix checkpatch warning: "Macro argument 'iobase' may be better > as '(iobase)' to avoid precedence issues changed to inline function. > > Signed-off-by: Guru Mehar Rachaputi <gurumeharrachaputi@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes in v2: > - Macros with one statement that calls 'iowrite8' function changed > to inline function as reviewed by gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. > In relation to this, names of the callers of macro are modified > to call this function. > --- Hi, This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree. You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below: - Your patch contains warnings and/or errors noticed by the scripts/checkpatch.pl tool. If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot >
