On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 01:51:22PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Check buffer index is in range inside atomisp_qbuf_wrapper() before
> using it do index pipe->frame_request_config_id[].
...
> /* FIXME this abuse of buf->reserved2 comes from the original atomisp buffer handling */
Does the comment belong to this check?
> + if (buf->index >= vdev->queue->num_buffers)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> if (!atomisp_is_vf_pipe(pipe) &&
> (buf->reserved2 & ATOMISP_BUFFER_HAS_PER_FRAME_SETTING)) {
> /* this buffer will have a per-frame parameter */
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
