On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:31:24PM +0530, Gaurav Pathak wrote:
> Modified vchiq_platform_init() as static to fix sparse warning
> > warning: symbol 'vchiq_platform_init' was not declared. Should it be
> > static?
Put the warning line all on one line, no need to wrap that.
> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Pathak <gauravpathak129@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> index dc33490ba7fb..ffa517077b80 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c
> @@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ free_pagelist(struct vchiq_instance *instance, struct vchiq_pagelist_info *pagel
> cleanup_pagelistinfo(instance, pagelistinfo);
> }
>
> -int vchiq_platform_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct vchiq_state *state)
> +static int vchiq_platform_init(struct platform_device *pdev, struct vchiq_state *state)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct vchiq_drvdata *drvdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> --
> 2.39.0
>
>
What changed to enable this version of the patch to work properly
compared to the previous submissions that broke the build? Did you test
this and it now works properly?
thanks,
greg k-h
