On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 20:53:44 +0100, Stephen Kitt <steve@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 21:24:20 +0100, Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Here are my pending patches from last June on lore: > > > > > > > All patches are handled I think except this: > > > * https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220608205623.2106113-1-steve@xxxxxxx/ > > > > > > > Can I ask you to drop the assignment that is not needed, and resend with > > the collected acks/r-b. > > > > With this, then all fbdev patches are handled. > > Ah yes, it was revised as > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220609180440.3138625-1-steve@xxxxxxx/ which > only got one ack (from you, > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YqJCKQmQEuVsbspK@xxxxxxxxxxxx/). Should I > resend that or is that usable as-is? Or would it be better if I sent all the > fbdev patches again (collecting all the acks and reviews)? Since the others are already in fbdev/for-next, I’ve just resent v2 of this patch with your ack. Regards, Stephen
Attachment:
pgpd36qt4EU8U.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
