On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 06:57:07PM +0530, Umang Jain wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Thanks for the comment,
>
> On 11/17/22 6:43 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 06:29:52PM +0530, Umang Jain wrote:
> > > From: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > struct vchiq_mmal_component.enabled is a u32 type. Do not assign
> > > it a bool.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 640e77466e69 ("staging: mmal-vchiq: Avoid use of bool in structures")
> > > Signed-off-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/vc04_services/vchiq-mmal/mmal-vchiq.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/vchiq-mmal/mmal-vchiq.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/vchiq-mmal/mmal-vchiq.c
> > > index cb921c94996a..17f8ceda87ca 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/vchiq-mmal/mmal-vchiq.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/vchiq-mmal/mmal-vchiq.c
> > > @@ -1773,7 +1773,7 @@ int vchiq_mmal_component_enable(struct vchiq_mmal_instance *instance,
> > > ret = enable_component(instance, component);
> > > if (ret == 0)
> > > - component->enabled = true;
> > > + component->enabled = 1;
> > Why not make enabled a bool instead?
>
> Makes sense. It would probably require reverting the 640e77466e69 ("staging:
> mmal-vchiq: Avoid use of bool in structures")
>
Reverting that patch seems like a good idea.
regards,
dan carpenter
