On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 09:35:11PM +1100, Jacob Bai wrote: > -u32 RTL8192E_PHY_REG_1T2R_ARRAY[RTL8192E_PHY_REG_1T2R_ARRAY_LEN] = { > +u32 RTL8192E_PHY_REG_1T2R_ARRAY[] = { > 0x800, 0x00000000, > 0x804, 0x00000001, > 0x808, 0x0000fc00, > @@ -158,8 +159,9 @@ u32 RTL8192E_PHY_REG_1T2R_ARRAY[RTL8192E_PHY_REG_1T2R_ARRAY_LEN] = { > 0xe18, 0x161a1a1a, > 0xe1c, 0x12121416, > }; > +u32 RTL8192E_PHY_REG_1T2R_ARRAY_LEN = ARRAY_SIZE(RTL8192E_PHY_REG_1T2R_ARRAY); This patch is kind of a headache to review. I have to go through and count 148 array elements to ensure that the array hasn't changed size. But the first patch renames all these arrays, so I first have go back to patch #1 to find the original name. It might be easier to do the renames afterward. Also the commit message should say something like "I have checked the object code and there is no change at all" or "I have counted all these array elements and there is no change to the size of the array." regards, dan carpenter