On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 07:00:05PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> The ARRAY_SIZE(foo) macro should be preferred over sizeof operator
> based computation such as sizeof(foo)/sizeof(foo[0]) for finding
> number of elements in an array. Issue identified using coccicheck.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft.h b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft.h
> index 2c2b5f1c1df3..5506a473be91 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft.h
> @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ struct fbtft_par {
> bool polarity;
> };
>
> -#define NUMARGS(...) (sizeof((int[]){__VA_ARGS__}) / sizeof(int))
> +#define NUMARGS(...) ARRAY_SIZE(((int[]){ __VA_ARGS__ }))
Please please please test-build your patches before sending them out.
To not do so just wastes reviewer resources :(
thanks,
greg k-h
