On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 10:56:33AM +0000, Tanjuate Brunostar wrote: > Code style warnings reported by checkpatch. > Improve the layout of a function header: > Put the first parameter immediately after the '(' and align the other > parameters underneath it. > > Signed-off-by: Tanjuate Brunostar <tanjubrunostar0@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > v2: put static and void on the same line and adjusted the indentation as > suggested by Greg KH > --- > drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c | 18 ++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c > index 5bdb5176772c..d987f7dff02a 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c > @@ -85,10 +85,8 @@ static const unsigned short wFB_Opt1[2][5] = { > #define DATADUR_A_F1 13 > > /*--------------------- Static Functions --------------------------*/ > -static > -void > -s_vFillRTSHead( > - struct vnt_private *pDevice, > +static void > +s_vFillRTSHead(struct vnt_private *pDevice, > unsigned char byPktType, > void *pvRTS, > unsigned int cbFrameLength, > @@ -96,13 +94,10 @@ s_vFillRTSHead( > bool bDisCRC, > struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr, > unsigned short wCurrentRate, > - unsigned char byFBOption > -); > + unsigned char byFBOption); > > -static > -void > -s_vGenerateTxParameter( > - struct vnt_private *pDevice, > +static void > +s_vGenerateTxParameter(struct vnt_private *pDevice, > unsigned char byPktType, > struct vnt_tx_fifo_head *, > void *pvRrvTime, > @@ -112,8 +107,7 @@ s_vGenerateTxParameter( > bool bNeedACK, > unsigned int uDMAIdx, > void *psEthHeader, > - unsigned short wCurrentRate > -); > + unsigned short wCurrentRate); > > static unsigned int > s_cbFillTxBufHead(struct vnt_private *pDevice, unsigned char byPktType, > -- > 2.34.1 > I think you mistakenly sent v2 again.. Best regards, Nam