On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 09:39:08AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2022, Deepak R Varma wrote:
>
> > The done_buffer count is already available in the hdm_channel struct.
> > Calling dim_get_channel_state function to source this value out of
> > the same structure is unnecessary.
> > Further, the second parameter struct dim_ch_state_t to this function
> > is filled by using the hdm_channel inside the function. This filled in
> > variable is never used in the caller and can be altogether removed.
> > So, a call to dim_get_channel_state function in this context also
> > deems expensive.
>
> Thanks for the rewrite.
>
> I find "source this value out of" hard to understand.
>
> I would have written something like the following:
>
> The function dim_get_channel_state only serves to initialize the ready and
> done_buffers fields of the structure passed as its second argument. In
> service_done_flag, this structure is never used again and the only purpose
> of the call is to get the value that is put in the done_buffers field.
> But that value is just the done_sw_buffers_number field of the call's
> first argument. So the whole call is useless, and we can just replace it
> with an access to this field.
>
> This change implies that the variable st is no longer used, so drop it as
> well.
This is really well written. Sounds much structured. Now my own log message
sounds a little random :)
Is it okay for me to use your verbiage as is in my patch log?
Thank you,
./drv
>
> ---
>
> If you want to work some more in this code, the name of the type
> dim_ch_state_t should not have an _t at the end of it. It looks like it
> used to be a typedef and someone eliminated the typedef but didn't drop
> the _t.
>
> julia
>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > 1. Update patch log message to be more descriptive about the reason for change.
> > Feedback provided by julia.lawall@xxxxxxxx
> >
> > PLEASE NOTE: I have only built the module on my machine, but have not tested it.
> > I am not sure how to test this change. I am willing to test it with appropriate
> > guidance provided I have the necessary hardware.
> >
> >
> > drivers/staging/most/dim2/dim2.c | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/dim2/dim2.c b/drivers/staging/most/dim2/dim2.c
> > index ab72e11ac5ab..4c1f27898a29 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/most/dim2/dim2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/most/dim2/dim2.c
> > @@ -259,7 +259,6 @@ static void retrieve_netinfo(struct dim2_hdm *dev, struct mbo *mbo)
> > static void service_done_flag(struct dim2_hdm *dev, int ch_idx)
> > {
> > struct hdm_channel *hdm_ch = dev->hch + ch_idx;
> > - struct dim_ch_state_t st;
> > struct list_head *head;
> > struct mbo *mbo;
> > int done_buffers;
> > @@ -271,7 +270,7 @@ static void service_done_flag(struct dim2_hdm *dev, int ch_idx)
> >
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&dim_lock, flags);
> >
> > - done_buffers = dim_get_channel_state(&hdm_ch->ch, &st)->done_buffers;
> > + done_buffers = hdm_ch->ch.done_sw_buffers_number;
> > if (!done_buffers) {
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dim_lock, flags);
> > return;
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
