On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:38:19AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 09:11:58AM +0200, Nam Cao wrote: > > > Find in this email a comment from Greg about RFC: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/YwS4WDekXM3UQ7Yo@xxxxxxxxx/ > > > This patch is marked as "RFC" but I don't see any questions that you > > > have here. Please resolve anything you think needs to be handled and > > > submit a "this series is ok to be merged" version. > > > > > > May be this is applicable to this patch as well. > > > > I add the RFC tag to "tells maintainers should review your patch thoroughly, > > and provide feedback. RFC is typically used when sending feature patches for > > the first time, or anytime the patch is more than just a simple bug fix." > > (from https://kernelnewbies.org/PatchTipsAndTricks). I was not aware that this > > tag may be interpreted differently. I can send a new patchset if necessary. > > Clean up patches are much simpler than bug fixes. No need for an RFC. > > But this patch does too many things and Greg will not apply it. Sorry, when I wrote this email I thought I was responding to a different thread. regards, dan carpenter
