Hi,
On 9/17/22 20:11, Kang Minchul wrote:
> This patch removes the following warning generated by checkpatch.pl
>
> WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
> #206: FILE: rtw_recv.c:206:
> +/*
> +signed int rtw_enqueue_recvframe(union recv_frame *precvframe, struct __queue *queue)
>
> WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
> #216: FILE: rtw_recv.c:216:
> +/*
> +caller : defrag ; recvframe_chk_defrag in recv_thread (passive)
>
> Signed-off-by: Kang Minchul <tegongkang@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
> index d8d394b67eeb..ad6fb6c3d1f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
> @@ -203,22 +203,22 @@ signed int rtw_enqueue_recvframe(union recv_frame *precvframe, struct __queue *q
> }
>
> /*
> -signed int rtw_enqueue_recvframe(union recv_frame *precvframe, struct __queue *queue)
> -{
> - return rtw_free_recvframe(precvframe, queue);
> -}
> -*/
> + * signed int rtw_enqueue_recvframe(union recv_frame *precvframe, struct __queue *queue)
> + * {
> + * return rtw_free_recvframe(precvframe, queue);
> + * }
> + */
>
>
>
>
> /*
> -caller : defrag ; recvframe_chk_defrag in recv_thread (passive)
> -pframequeue: defrag_queue : will be accessed in recv_thread (passive)
> -
> -using spinlock to protect
> -
> -*/
> + * caller : defrag ; recvframe_chk_defrag in recv_thread (passive)
> + * pframequeue: defrag_queue : will be accessed in recv_thread (passive)
> + *
> + * using spinlock to protect
> + *
> + */
>
> void rtw_free_recvframe_queue(struct __queue *pframequeue, struct __queue *pfree_recv_queue)
> {
