On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 10:12:56AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > Yes, you've got it right. > > I think Dan is suggesting something like the below, but > not necessarily in a single patch: > --- > drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ioctl_set.c | 38 ++++++++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ioctl_set.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ioctl_set.c > index 17f6bcbeebf42..2736bbce83b5b 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ioctl_set.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ioctl_set.c > @@ -390,44 +390,38 @@ u8 rtw_set_802_11_authentication_mode(struct adapter *padapter, enum ndis_802_11 > return ret; > } > > -u8 rtw_set_802_11_add_wep(struct adapter *padapter, struct ndis_802_11_wep *wep) > +int rtw_set_802_11_add_wep(struct adapter *padapter, > + struct ndis_802_11_wep *wep) > { > - int keyid, res; > - struct security_priv *psecuritypriv = &padapter->securitypriv; > - u8 ret = _SUCCESS; > + int keyid; > + struct security_priv *secpriv = &padapter->securitypriv; > > keyid = wep->KeyIndex & 0x3fffffff; > - > - if (keyid >= 4) { > - ret = false; > - goto exit; > - } > + if (keyid >= 4) > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > switch (wep->KeyLength) { > case 5: > - psecuritypriv->dot11PrivacyAlgrthm = _WEP40_; > + secpriv->dot11PrivacyAlgrthm = _WEP40_; > break; > case 13: > - psecuritypriv->dot11PrivacyAlgrthm = _WEP104_; > + secpriv->dot11PrivacyAlgrthm = _WEP104_; > break; > default: > - psecuritypriv->dot11PrivacyAlgrthm = _NO_PRIVACY_; > + secpriv->dot11PrivacyAlgrthm = _NO_PRIVACY_; > break; > } > > - memcpy(&psecuritypriv->dot11DefKey[keyid].skey[0], &wep->KeyMaterial, wep->KeyLength); > + memcpy(secpriv->dot11DefKey[keyid].skey, &wep->KeyMaterial, > + wep->KeyLength); > > - psecuritypriv->dot11DefKeylen[keyid] = wep->KeyLength; > + secpriv->dot11DefKeylen[keyid] = wep->KeyLength; > + secpriv->dot11PrivacyKeyIndex = keyid; > > - psecuritypriv->dot11PrivacyKeyIndex = keyid; > + if (rtw_set_key(padapter, secpriv, keyid, 1) == _FAIL) > + return -ENOMEM; > > - res = rtw_set_key(padapter, psecuritypriv, keyid, 1); > - > - if (res == _FAIL) > - ret = false; > -exit: > - > - return ret; > + return 0; > } > > /* > Hi Joe, Thanks for the suggestion, this is pretty much what I'd interpreted from Dan's advice in the meantime. I will prepare a V2 tomorrow. Regards, Phil