On sabato 23 aprile 2022 20:47:48 CEST Vihas Makwana wrote: > recvframe_chk_defrag() performs a NULL check on psta, but if that check > fails then it dereferences it, which it shouldn't do as psta is NULL. > > Set pdefrag_q to NULL if above check fails and let the code after it handle > that case. > > Fixes: 1cc18a22b96b ("staging: r8188eu: Add files for new driver - part 5") > Signed-off-by: Vihas Makwana <makvihas@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c b/drivers/staging/ r8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c > index c1005ddaa..db54bceff 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c > @@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ struct recv_frame *recvframe_chk_defrag(struct adapter *padapter, struct recv_fr > pdefrag_q = NULL; > } > } else { > - pdefrag_q = &psta->sta_recvpriv.defrag_q; > + pdefrag_q = NULL; Hi Vihas, To me the code looks like this... struct sta_info *psta; ... psta = rtw_get_stainfo(pstapriv, psta_addr); /* The code is about to test if "psta" is a valid pointer */ if (!psta) { /* "psta" is NULL */ ... } else { /* "psta" is not NULL */ ... > } > Also, even if "psta" were NULL (but it isn't), your change would still be no good. Please be very careful with these types of changes next time :) Thanks, Fabio M. De Francesco > if ((ismfrag == 0) && (fragnum == 0)) > -- > 2.30.2 >